Design methodology and the Myth of Common Sense
Transcript
| Time | Topic | Related Links |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | What’s on this episode? | |
| 1:34 | Design Methodology The Risk Reduction Hierarchy: Eliminate/Substitute, Safeguard, Warn, Train, PPE Discussing the effectiveness of each step in reducing risk. | EN 292–1 (obsolete), EN 292–2 (obsolete), ISO 12100–1 (obsolete), ISO 12100–2 (obsolete), CSA Z432 EN 292 and ISO 12100–1/-2 were replaced by EN ISO 12100:2010 and ISO 12100:2010. |
| 5:23 | Hazard Based Safety Engineering approach to risk reduction | |
| 7:45 | Hazard Warning Labels | ANSI Z535 family, ISO 3864, ISO 7000 |
| 10:45 | CSA Z321 – Not a product labelling standard! | CSA Z321 This standard has been withdrawn by CSA. |
| 11:30 | ANSI Z535.6 – Hazard warnings in user documentation. | |
| 12:30 | Why do Risk Assessments on your product? Advantages and Disadvantages | |
| 19:05 | The Myth of Common Sense! Kitchen knives, laser cutters and why common sense isn’t so common. | |
| 21:37 | The Angle Grinder Case | |
| 24:00 | Is the product Safe Enough? US OSHA, Ontario OHSA & Ontario Regulation 851. |
Send your comments and questions to Doug Nix.
In the next episode, we’ll be discussing Risk Scoring Systems with Tom Doyle of Industrial Safety Integration.