Laser Safety with Johnny Jones — V2N4

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

In this episode, your host, Doug Nix, inter­views John­ny Jones. John­ny is a laser safe­ty expert with decades of expe­ri­ence in laser research and devel­op­ment. At one time, John­ny served as the Laser Safe­ty Offi­cer at Los Alam­os Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ries in New Mexico. 

Lasers have become ubiq­ui­tous since their inven­tion, bring­ing relat­ed safe­ty haz­ards. Laser safe­ty is cov­ered by a few stan­dards, includ­ing ANSI Z136.1, CSA E60825‑1 and IEC 60825–1. Laser safe­ty train­ing is avail­able from a few sources. In this episode, Doug talks to John­ny Jones of Laser Pro­fes­sion­als about this impor­tant topic.

Lis­ten to episode V2N4

Transcript

Doug inter­views John­ny Jones of Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc. (now Ken­tek) about cur­rent trends in research and indus­tri­al laser safe­ty and haz­ard analy­sis. John­ny dis­cuss­es the Laser Safe­ty Offi­cer Train­ing Cours­es pro­vid­ed by Laser Pro­fes­sion­als inc., includ­ing the course held in Toron­to, Ontario, in con­junc­tion with QPS Eval­u­a­tion Ser­vices inc.

Show Notes (Run Time 17:51)
0:00 Intro
3:28 Inter­view with John­ny Jones
4:00 John­ny builds his first laser
4:25 Becom­ing a Laser Safe­ty Offi­cer
5:30 Cur­rent activ­i­ties — Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc. and Laser Safe­ty Train­ing
6:04 Today’s Chal­lenges
6:17 Laser Safe­ty Stan­dards
6:33 Ade­quate Per­son­nel Train­ing
6:48 Stan­dards Har­mo­niza­tion between North Amer­i­ca and the rest of the world.
8:41 Com­ing Chal­lenges — Fibre lasers and fem­tosec­ond lasers
9:38 Laser Train­ing Cours­es by Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc. (now Ken­tek), www.laser-professionals.com , QPS Eval­u­a­tion Ser­vices Inc., www.qps.ca
12:23 Cer­ti­fied Laser Safe­ty Offi­cer des­ig­na­tion, Board of Laser Safe­ty, http://www.lasersafety.org/
14:13 FREE Col­lege and Uni­ver­si­ty Laser Train­ing Mate­ri­als
15:14 FREE Web-based Laser Haz­ard Analy­sis Tool
15:36 Con­tact­ing Johnny

Cana­di­an Train­ing starts on 18-June-2007. Con­tact QPS Eval­u­a­tion Ser­vices Inc . for more infor­ma­tion. (416) 241‑8857, (877) 746‑4777

John­ny Jones,
Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc.
PO Box 1080,
Los Alam­os NM 87544
USA

(505) 662‑5782
(888) 795‑2737 (US Only)
[email protected]

Introducing ISO 13849–1, Reliability of Safety Related Parts of Control Systems—V2N3

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

Introducing ISO 13849–1 2006

This show, dis­cussing ISO 13849–1, was record­ed live at the 2007 CSA/RIA Robot­ic Safe­ty Con­fer­ence in Toron­to, Ontario, in March 2007. Func­tion­al safe­ty is a key aspect of machin­ery safe­ty and one that many design­ers and engi­neers poor­ly understand. 

If you need more cur­rent infor­ma­tion, see the series of posts on this top­ic on our blog:

If you need some help with func­tion­al safe­ty, see our func­tion­al safe­ty con­sult­ing ser­vices.

We offer a course to help you get start­ed using ISO 13849. See the course curriculum.

Listen to the show

Lis­ten to episode V2N3

Transcript

Doug dis­cuss­es the basic ele­ments of the 2006 edi­tion of ISO 13849–1 dur­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion at the 2007 CSA/RIA Robot­ic Safe­ty Con­fer­ence in Toron­to, Ontario. The pre­sen­ta­tion intro­duces Per­for­mance Lev­els (PL and PLr), Diag­nos­tic Cov­er­age (DC) and Com­mon Cause Fail­ures (CCF). Learn the mean­ing of MTTFd, B10 and B10d and their sig­nif­i­cance in the design of safe­ty sys­tems for machinery.

This show runs 50:22.

Download the presentation

[mdocs single-file=“Whats New in ISO 13849–1.pdf”]

Send your com­ments and ques­tions to Doug Nix.

In our next episode, we’ll be talk­ing about laser safe­ty with John­ny Jones of Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc. (now Kentek)

Hazard Identification — V2N2

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

In this episode, your host, Doug Nix, talks about one of the most impor­tant parts of risk assess­ment: haz­ard iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. Learn about what haz­ards are and how to han­dle haz­ards that you don’t have enough expe­ri­ence to evaluate.

Lis­ten to episode V2N2

Transcript

TimeTop­icRelat­ed Links
00:00Wel­come to the Safe­ty Guy Podcast! 
01:24Where I’ve been the last 2–1/2 months 
01:48Mail Bag 
04:51Recap of the last show. Con­tact Tom Doyle at Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion to find out more about CIRSMA Risk Man­age­ment Software. 
05:50Pod­Camp Toron­to 07 
07:03Haz­ard Identification 
07:22What is a hazard?EN 1050 / ISO 14121 Ontario Min­istry of Labour CCOHS: Cana­di­an Cen­tre for Occu­pa­tion­al Health and Safe­ty US OHSA
11:19Haz­ards that you don’t have enough expe­ri­ence to evaluate.QPS Eval­u­a­tion Ser­vices Inc. Elec­tri­cal Inspec­tion and Cer­ti­fi­ca­tion Laser Pro­fes­sion­als Inc. (now Ken­tek) Laser Haz­ard Analy­sis, Laser Safe­ty Train­ing and Laser Safe­ty Con­sult­ing Ser­vices Radi­a­tion Safe­ty Insti­tute of Cana­da. Ion­iz­ing radi­a­tion haz­ard analy­sis and con­sult­ing services.
12:20Esti­mat­ing Severity 
14:30Kitchen knives vs. Belt Drives 
17:58How far do you have to go when iden­ti­fy­ing hazards? 


Send your com­ments and ques­tions to Doug Nix.

In our next episode, we’ll intro­duce the con­cept of Con­trol Reli­a­bil­i­ty and talk a bit about the key stan­dard for machine builders, ISO 13849–1: Safe­ty of machin­ery — Safe­ty-relat­ed parts of con­trol sys­tems — Part 1: Gen­er­al prin­ci­ples for design.

Risk Scoring Systems—An Interview with Tom Doyle — V2N1

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

Risk scoring systems

In this episode, your host, Doug Nix, inter­views Tom Doyle of Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion, a Cana­di­an com­pa­ny offer­ing risk assess­ment soft­ware to help prac­ti­tion­ers bet­ter struc­ture their risk assess­ments and pro­duce reports for oth­er safe­ty engi­neer­ing and reg­u­la­to­ry com­pli­ance requirements.

Note: Sad­ly, Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion is no longer in business.

Transcript

One of the key tools in car­ry­ing out a risk assess­ment is the risk scor­ing sys­tem used. There are lots of risk-scor­ing sys­tems out there, so how do you choose one for your project? What about risk assess­ment and risk man­age­ment soft­ware sys­tems? Tom Doyle, Pres­i­dent of Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion, joins Doug to dis­cuss these impor­tant issues.

The pri­ma­ry tool used in risk assess­ment is the risk scor­ing sys­tem. These sys­tems range in com­plex­i­ty from sim­ple, two-vari­able meth­ods that con­sid­er only sever­i­ty and aggre­gate prob­a­bil­i­ty to much more sophis­ti­cat­ed sys­tems with four or more vari­ables. Scal­ing is also wide­ly vari­able, with as few as two choic­es to as many fif­teen choic­es for each vari­able. Some pure­ly math­e­mat­i­cal mod­els use prob­a­bil­i­ty cal­cu­la­tions to deter­mine risk lev­els. How do you choose a sys­tem? How fine do the scales need to be to give you results that make sense?

Tom Doyle, Pres­i­dent of Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion, a Cana­di­an man­u­fac­tur­er of Risk Man­age­ment soft­ware, joins Doug to dis­cuss these issues. 

Send your com­ments and ques­tions to Doug Nix.

In our next episode, we’ll delve deep­er into Haz­ard Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, the first step in risk analysis.

Design Methodology and The Myth of Common Sense — Episode V1N2

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

Design Methodology and the Myth of Common Sense

In this episode, your host, Doug Nix, dis­cuss­es design method­ol­o­gy and the myth of com­mon sense that is often used as jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to do noth­ing to improve the safe­ty of a prod­uct. Learn about the Hier­ar­chy of Con­trols, haz­ard-based safe­ty engi­neer­ing, haz­ard warn­ing labels, and the appli­ca­tion of stan­dards to the machine man­u­als. Final­ly, how do you know if a prod­uct is safe enough?

Lis­ten to episode V1N2

Transcript

TimeTop­icRelat­ed Links
00:00What’s on this episode? 
1:34Design Method­ol­o­gy

The Risk Reduc­tion Hier­ar­chy: Eliminate/Substitute, Safe­guard, Warn, Train, PPE
Dis­cussing the effec­tive­ness of each step in reduc­ing risk.
EN 292–1 (obso­lete), EN 292–2 (obso­lete), ISO 12100–1 (obso­lete), ISO 12100–2 (obso­lete), CSA Z432
EN 292 and ISO 12100–1/-2 were replaced by EN ISO 12100:2010 and ISO 12100:2010.
5:23Haz­ard Based Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing approach to risk reduction 
7:45Haz­ard Warn­ing LabelsANSI Z535 fam­i­ly, ISO 3864–1 (there are three parts), ISO 7000
10:45CSA Z321 – Not a prod­uct labelling standard!CSA Z321 This stan­dard has been with­drawn by CSA.
11:30ANSI Z535.6 – Haz­ard warn­ings in user documentation. 
12:30Why do Risk Assess­ments on your prod­uct? Advan­tages and Disadvantages 
19:05The Myth of Com­mon Sense! Kitchen knives, laser cut­ters and why com­mon sense isn’t so common. 
21:37The Angle Grinder Case 
24:00Is the prod­uct Safe Enough? US OSHA, Ontario OHSA & Ontario Reg­u­la­tion 851. 

Down­load the show notes below

Send your com­ments and ques­tions to Doug Nix.

In the next episode, we’ll dis­cuss Risk Scor­ing Sys­tems with Tom Doyle, Prin­ci­pal at Indus­tri­al Safe­ty Inte­gra­tion.

Who is the Safety Guy? What is Safety Engineering? Episode V1N1

Laptop computer set up with two microphones and an audio mixer for posdcasting production

Who is the Safety Guy? What is Safety Engineering?

Wel­come to the first episode of the Safe­ty Guy pod­cast. Your host, Doug Nix, shares var­i­ous per­spec­tives on machin­ery safe­ty top­ics in this show. In this episode, you’ll learn a bit about Doug and his back­ground; then, you’ll learn a bit about the safe­ty engi­neer­ing discipline. 

Lis­ten to episode V1N1

Transcript

TimeTop­icRelat­ed Links
00:00What’s on the show today? 
00:51Intro­duc­ing the Safe­ty Guy.
- Why both­er to pod­cast on machin­ery safety?
 
1:46The Safe­ty Guy’s philosophy 
3:41What’s in the rest of the episode?
- Intro­duc­ing IEEE’s Prod­uct Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing Soci­ety
- New Machin­ery Safe­ty Web­site
- Haz­ard Based Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing Mod­el
- Basic Design Methodologies
 
4:41The Need for Edu­ca­tion in Safe­ty-based Design 
8:33Resources for Self-EducationCom­pli­ance Engi­neer­ing Mag­a­zine, http://www.ce-mag.com/
Com­pli­ance Mag­a­zine, http://www.compliancemag.com/
Con­for­mi­ty Mag­a­zine, http://www.conformity.com/
IEEE Prod­uct Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing Soci­ety (PSES), http://www.ieee-pses.org/
IEEE EMC Prod­uct Safe­ty Tech­ni­cal Com­mit­tee (EMC-PSTC), http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
IEEE PSES Com­pli­ance Forum, http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/emc-pstc.html
IEEE Elec­tri­cal Safe­ty Forum, https://www.ieeecommunities.org/ieee.safety
IEEE PSES Sym­po­sium, http://www.www.ieee-pses/symposium/
11:10The basics of safe­ty engineering 
11:26UL University’s Haz­ard Based Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing (HBSE) SeminarHaz­ard Based Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing Sem­i­nar,
http://www.uluniversity.com/SUTRA/shopul/customer/home.php?cat=341
11:35The HBSE Model 
17:50Con­trol Measures 
18:18Risk Assess­ment and the Ford Pin­to Case 
20:40The pop­u­lar­iza­tion of Risk Assess­ment: EN 1050 (aka ISO 14121) and the con­cepts of Pre­lim­i­nary Haz­ard Analy­sis (PHA) 
21:45Risk Scor­ing based on EN 954–1 Annex A (aka ISO 13849–1) 
22:45Bruce W. Main – Design Safe­ty Engi­neer­ing, Tom Doyle – Indus­tri­al Safe­ty IntegrationIndus­tri­al Safe­ty Integration
23:06ANSI B11.19 Stan­dard, ANSI/RIA 15.06 Stan­dard, CSA Z434 Standard 
23:40Why don’t more machine builders do risk assessments? 
24:43Oth­er meth­ods – FMEA, FTA 
25:30Bruce Main’s textbookRisk Assess­ment Basics and Bench­marks. Read the review in IEEE Xplore before you buy.

Down­load the show notes ⬇️

Send your com­ments and ques­tions to Doug Nix.

In the next episode, we’ll be dis­cussing safe­ty-based design method­ol­o­gy and we’ll get deep­er into risk assessment.